Final data recovery.Results for “final data recovery”

 

Final data recovery

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

FinalData 3.0 / 2.0.Download FinalData Standard Free

 

Jul 20,  · FinalData Standard Publisher’s Description. FinalData, a world-class Data Recovery Utility, recovers files quickly and effectively. Using the latest in data recovery technology, it recovers files that may have been accidentally deleted, erased, damaged, or emptied from the Recycle Bin. FinalData can also recover data after formatting or loss of partition on the hard drive, and can recover files 5/5(2). FINALDATA Enterprise is a user-friendly tool for the recovery of data created, stored and used by the average User that has since been deleted, damaged, or lost. This includes data from emptied trash bins or data damaged by viruses. FinalData is a software tool that can be used in order to aid individuals in recovering lost or damaged data from your hard drive, as well as form external data devices. Clear-cut interface.

 

Final data recovery.Final Data Enterprise 2 ( Portable )

FINALDATA Enterprise is a user-friendly tool for the recovery of data created, stored and used by the average User that has since been deleted, damaged, or lost. This includes data from emptied trash bins or data damaged by viruses. FinalData is a software tool that can be used in order to aid individuals in recovering lost or damaged data from your hard drive, as well as form external data devices. Clear-cut interface. May 18,  · Data recovery and analysis should be accomplished in a thorough, efficient manner, using the most cost- effective techniques practicable. A responsible archeological data recovery plan should provide for reporting and dissemination of results, as well as interpretation of what has been learned so that it is understandable and accessible to the public.
 
 
related:

FinalData Standard Review
Download FinalData Standard

All-in-One Free Data Recovery Software for Different Data Loss Situations
FinalData – CNET Download

Sections One such category of historic properties is comprised of prehistoric or historic archeological resources.

The National Register of Historic Places defines an archeological site as “the place or places where the remnants of a past culture survive in a physical context that allows for the interpretation of these remains” National Register Bulletin 36, “Guidelines for Evaluating and Registering Historical Archeological Sites and Districts,” , p. Such properties may meet criteria for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places for a variety of reasons, not the least of which may be because “they have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important to prehistory or history” National Register Criteria for Evaluation, 36 CFR In the context of taking into account the effects of a proposed Federal or federally assisted undertaking on any district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register, potential impacts to archeological sites often need to be considered.

Appropriate treatments for affected archeological sites, or portions of archeological sites, may include active preservation in place for future study or other use, recovery or partial recovery of archeological data, public interpretive display, or any combination of these and other measures.

The nature and scope of treatments for such properties should be determined in consultation with other parties, but in ACHP’s experience they generally need to be guided by certain basic principles:. Under 36 CFR Based on the principles articulated above, ACHP recommends that the following issues be considered and addressed when archeological sites are so affected, and recovery of significant information from them through excavation and other scientific means is the most appropriate preservation outcome.

The archeological site should not contain or be likely to contain human remains, associated or unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects, or items of cultural patrimony as those terms are defined by the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act 25 U.

The archeological site should not have long-term preservation value, such as traditional cultural and religious importance to an Indian tribe or a Native Hawaiian organization. The archeological site should not possess special significance to another ethnic group or community that historically ascribes cultural or symbolic value to the site and would object to the site’s excavation and removal of its contents.

The archeological site should not be valuable for potential permanent in-situ display or public interpretation, although temporary public display and interpretation during the course of any excavations may be highly appropriate.

The Federal Agency Official should ensure that the data recovery plan is developed and will be implemented by or under the direct supervision of a person, or persons, meeting at a minimum the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards 48 FR The Federal Agency Official should ensure that adequate time and money to carry out all aspects of the plan are provided, and should ensure that all parties consulted in the development of the plan are kept informed of the status of its implementation.

Large, unusual, or complex projects should provide for special oversight, including professional peer review. The Federal Agency Official should determine that there are no unresolved issues concerning the recovery of significant information with any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that may attach religious and cultural significance to the affected property. The agency should retain a copy of the agreement and supporting documentation in the project files. Whereas, the consulting parties agree that recovery of significant information from the archeological site s listed above may be done in accordance with the published guidance; and.

Whereas, the consulting parties agree that it is in the public interest to expand funds to implement this project through the recovery of significant information from archeological sites to mitigate the adverse effects of the project; and.

Whereas, the consulting parties agree that Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations that may attach religious or cultural importance to the affected property ies have been consulted and have raised no objection to the work proposed; and. Whereas, to the best of our knowledge and belief, no human remains, associated or unassociated funerary objects or sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony as defined in the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act 25 U.

Now, therefore, the [Federal Agency] shall ensure that the following terms and conditions, including the appended Archeological Data Recovery Plan, will be implemented in a timely manner and with adequate resources in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act of 16 U.

Nevertheless, remember that tribes that have not been so certified have the same consultation and concurrence rights as THPOs when the undertaking takes place, or affects historic properties, on their tribal lands. In accordance with Secs. The full text of the guidance is reproduced under the Supplementary Information section of this notice. Supplementary Information The full text of the guidance, with the model Memorandum of Agreement, is reproduced below.

Background Sections Archeological Sites and Their Treatment The nature and scope of treatments for such properties should be determined in consultation with other parties, but in ACHP’s experience they generally need to be guided by certain basic principles: The pursuit of knowledge about the past is in the public interest.

An archeological site may have important values for living communities and cultural descendants in addition to its significance as a resource for learning about the past; its appropriate treatment depends on its research significance, weighed against these other public values. Not all information about the past is equally important; therefore, not all archeological sites are equally important for research purposes. Methods for recovering information from archeological sites, particularly large-scale excavation, are by their nature destructive.

The site is destroyed as it is excavated. Therefore management of archeological sites should be conducted in a spirit of stewardship for future generations, with full recognition of their non-renewable nature and their potential multiple uses and public values.

Given the non-renewable nature of archeological sites, it follows that if an archeological site can be practically preserved in place for future study or other use, it usually should be although there are exceptions. However, simple avoidance of a site is not the same as preservation. Recovery of significant archeological information through controlled excavation and other scientific recording methods, as well as destruction without data recovery, may both be appropriate treatments for certain archeological sites.

Once a decision has been made to recover archeological information through the naturally destructive methods of excavation, a research design and data recovery plan based on firm background data, sound planning, and accepted archeological methods should be formulated and implemented. Data recovery and analysis should be accomplished in a thorough, efficient manner, using the most cost- effective techniques practicable. A responsible archeological data recovery plan should provide for reporting and dissemination of results, as well as interpretation of what has been learned so that it is understandable and accessible to the public.

Appropriate arrangements for curation of archeological materials and records should be made. Adequate time and funds should be budgeted for fulfillment of the overall plan.

Archeological data recovery plans and their research designs should be grounded in and related to the priorities established in regional, state, and local historic preservation plans, the needs of land and resource managers, academic research interests, and other legitimate public interests.

Human remains and funerary objects deserve respect and should be treated appropriately. The presence of human remains in an archeological site usually gives the site an added importance as a burial site or cemetery, and the values associated with burial sites need to be fully considered in the consultation process. Large-scale, long-term archeological identification and management programs require careful consideration of management needs, appreciation for the range of archeological values represented, periodic synthesis of research and other program results, and professional peer review and oversight.

Disputes regarding the completion of the terms of this agreement shall be resolved by the signatories. If the signatories cannot agree regarding a dispute, any one of the signatories may request the participation of ACHP to assist in resolving the dispute. This agreement shall be null and void if its terms are not carried out within 5 five years from the date of its execution, unless the signatories agree in writing to an extension for carrying out its terms.

John M. Fowler, Executive Director. Public Resource Type. Section